Tuesday, October 14, 2014

New paper finds a 'significant' 'missing driver in the Sun-Earth' climate connection via ozone production

A paper published today in Nature Communications finds a 'significant' 'missing driver in the Sun-Earth climate connection' via ozone production in the middle atmosphere. According to the authors, solar energetic electron precipitation (EEP)
"events strongly affect ozone at 60–80 km, leading to extremely large (up to 90%) short-term ozone depletion. This impact is comparable to that of large, but much less frequent, solar proton events. On solar cycle timescales, we find that EEP causes ozone variations of up to 34% at 70–80 km. With such a magnitude, it is reasonable to suspect that EEP could be an important part of solar influence on the atmosphere and climate system." 
"On solar cycle scales, we find that EEP causes significant ozone variations of up to 34% at 70–80 km. As ozone is important to atmospheric heating and cooling rates, this level of ozone variation could significantly affect the local mesospheric temperature balance6. Our results emphasize the importance of the EEP effect on mesospheric ozone and significantly improve our understanding of the impacts of the energetic particles on the atmosphere." 
"Most studies have concentrated on the so-called indirect particle precipitation effect caused by the production of odd nitrogen (NOx) in the polar upper atmosphere, its subsequent transport to lower altitudes inside the wintertime polar vortex, depletion of ozone in the stratosphere and effects on the radiative balance of the middle atmosphere10111213These effects may further couple to atmospheric dynamics and propagate downwards by changing polar winds and atmospheric wave propagation through wave—mean flow interaction141516. Several studies have suggested links between the EPP indirect effect on ozone and regional wintertime tropospheric climate variability." 
"Our results show that the direct, HOx-driven effect of EEP is causing significant, previously unaccounted for, ozone variability in the mesosphere that are observable on solar cycle timescales. Although these effects from EEP-HOx have not been considered in atmospheric and climate models to date, dynamical changes in the mesosphere and stratosphere have been reported as a result of SPEs and the indirect EEP impact on ozone1921." 
"Considering the magnitude of the direct ozone effect, tens of percent in wintertime polar regions, it is reasonable to suspect that EEP could be an important contributor to the Sun-climate connection on solar cycle timescales. For comparison, the 11-year variability in UV radiation has a less than 10% effect on annual mean mesospheric ozone at mid-to-low latitude222324. Thus, more research should be directed towards better understanding the potential further effects from EEP and its role in the overall Solar influence on climate. Currently, in most high-top climate models the solar input does not include EEP and it is completely missing from low-top models."
Ozone is the 3rd most influential greenhouse gas in the atmosphere, after water vapor and CO2, as illustrated by the large cooling effects upon the stratosphere in this illustration:


3. Stratospheric cooling rates:  The picture shows how water, cabon dioxide and ozone contribute to longwave cooling in the stratosphere.   Colours from blue through red, yellow and to green show increasing cooling, grey areas show warming of the stratosphere.  The tropopause is shown as dotted line (the troposphere below and the stratosphere above).  For CO2 it is obvious that there is no cooling in the troposphere [or warming!], but a strong cooling effect in the stratosphere.  Ozone, on the other hand, cools the upper stratosphere but warms the lower stratosphere.  Figure from: Clough and Iacono, JGR, 1995; adapted from the SPARC Website.  Please click to enlarge! (60 K)  [Source] [Rebuttal] [Ozone O3 is shown as a cooling agent in the upper stratosphere, but a warming agent in the upper troposphere to lower stratosphere]

In addition to the large effects on ozone as a potential solar amplification mechanism, this paper begs the question how much of the alleged ozone hole over Antarctica is related to solar activity vs. man-made CFCs? As this paper notes, these solar effects on ozone are most pronounced over the poles where the Antarctic ozone hole is located. In addition, the wide variations in the Antarctic ozone hole from year to year indicate solar activity is more likely responsible rather than a continuous effect from CFCs. Is this why no significant trend in the ozone hole has been found now 30 years after the Montreal Protocol to outlaw CFCs?

Excerpts from full paper:



Missing driver in the Sun–Earth connection from energetic electron precipitation impacts mesospheric ozone


Nature Communications
 
5,
 
Article number:
 
5197
 
doi:10.1038/ncomms6197
Received
 
Accepted
 
Published
 

Abstract




Energetic electron precipitation (EEP) from the Earth’s outer radiation belt continuously affects the chemical composition of the polar mesosphere. EEP can contribute to catalytic ozone loss in the mesosphere through ionization and enhanced production of odd hydrogen. However, the long-term mesospheric ozone variability caused by EEP has not been quantified or confirmed to date. Here we show, using observations from three different satellite instruments, that EEP events strongly affect ozone at 60–80 km, leading to extremely large (up to 90%) short-term ozone depletion. This impact is comparable to that of large, but much less frequent, solar proton events. On solar cycle timescales, we find that EEP causes ozone variations of up to 34% at 70–80 km. With such a magnitude, it is reasonable to suspect that EEP could be an important part of solar influence on the atmosphere and climate system.

At a glance

Figures

View all figures
left
  1. Signature of EEP in observed mesospheric ozone.
    Figure 1
  2. Magnitude of the short-term EEP effects on mesospheric ozone.
    Figure 2
  3. Magnitude of the long-term EEP effects on mesospheric ozone.
    Figure 3
right

Introduction




Energetic electron precipitation (EEP) from the Earth’s outer radiation belt continuously affects the chemical composition of the mesosphere across the geomagnetic latitudes 55–65°. At altitudes below ~80 km, EEP leads to odd hydrogen (HOx) enhancement following ionization and ion chemical reactions1, which is expected to contribute to the ozone balance in the mesosphere. A recent study considering the 2004–2009 period concluded that EEP was significantly affecting mesospheric HOxaround 35% of the time2. A set of case studies has demonstrated that EEP-HOx is expected to have a short-term effect on mesospheric ozone through well-known catalytic reaction chains3. The largest effects of EEP on HOx have been reported at 70–80 km, caused by electrons with energies between 100 and 300 keV. The EEP effect is most significant during and following geomagnetic storms, where dynamic processes inside the radiation belts accelerate electrons to high energies.
Here we show, using ozone observations from three different satellite instruments, that EEP events very strongly affect ozone at altitudes between 60 and 80 km. The EEP leads to an extremely large (up to 90%) short-term (days) ozone depletion in the atmosphere. The magnitude of these short-term effects is comparable to those caused by large but much less frequent solar proton events45. On solar cycle scales, we find that EEP causes significant ozone variations of up to 34% at 70–80 km. As ozone is important to atmospheric heating and cooling rates, this level of ozone variation could significantly affect the local mesospheric temperature balance6. Our results emphasize the importance of the EEP effect on mesospheric ozone and significantly improve our understanding of the impacts of the energetic particles on the atmosphere.

EEP in 2002–2012

Solar cycle 23 (SC23) was one of the longest cycles since 1847 and exhibited large variation in solar (UV radiation) and geomagnetic activity (solar storms, energetic particle precipitation). In 2003, during the declining phase of SC23, the majority of the days were geomagnetically disturbed. In contrast, the deep solar minimum that occurred in 2009 showed the lowest activity since the beginning of the Twentieth century. The current solar cycle (SC24) is so far the weakest cycle in the last 100 years. For this period, EEP events were strongest and most frequent during the transition between SC23 maximum and the following minimum (Fig. 1a). Almost 75% of all major EEP events (major=daily mean electron precipitation count rate exceeding 150 counts s−1) in the 2002–2012 period occurred between 2003 and 2006. The occurrence of solar proton events (SPEs) peaked during high solar activity (red numbers in Fig. 1a).


Figure 1: Signature of EEP in observed mesospheric ozone.
Signature of EEP in observed mesospheric ozone.
(a) Monthly mean ECRs (black bars), maximum proton flux >10 MeV (red numbers) in proton flux units (1 pfu=1 p cm−2 sr−1 s−1) and sunspot number (SSN, grey area) between 2002 and 2012. (b,c) Maximum O3loss (%) at altitudes between 70 and 78 km in the Northern hemisphere (b) and Southern hemisphere (c) during 60 EEP events, with daily ECR >150 (counts s−1). Numbers: the average O3 loss (%) for each set of available satellite measurements (MLS, SABER and GOMOS).
  • Full size image (94 KB)
  • ...
  • Figure 2: Magnitude of the short-term EEP effects on mesospheric ozone.
    Magnitude of the short-term EEP effects on mesospheric ozone.
    (ac) O3 anomalies (%) for selected EEP events in the Northern hemisphere and in the Southern hemisphere derived from GOMOS (a), SABER (b) and MLS (c) observations. Black dashed lines: EEP event start end end; red dashed lines: SPE event start end end; black numbers: daily mean ECRs; red numbers: >10 MeV pfu. (di) Superposed epoch analysis for EEP events with daily ECR >150 (counts s−1) showing ozone anomalies (%) and ECR (black lines) in the Northern hemisphere (d,f,h) and in the Southern hemisphere (e,g,i). White numbers: O3 loss at different altitudes.
  • ...
  • Long-term ozone variability

    Although the duration of the forcing for individual EEP events is only a few days, the high frequency of the events during active years (Fig. 1a) is enough to cause variability in mesospheric ozone on solar cycle timescales (Fig. 3a–c)...
  • Discussion




    In recent years, the atmospheric effects of energetic particle precipitation (=EEP+SPE) have received a considerable amount of scientific attention. Most studies have concentrated on the so-called indirect particle precipitation effect caused by the production of odd nitrogen (NOx) in the polar upper atmosphere, its subsequent transport to lower altitudes inside the wintertime polar vortex, depletion of ozone in the stratosphere and effects on the radiative balance of the middle atmosphere10111213. These effects may further couple to atmospheric dynamics and propagate downwards by changing polar winds and atmospheric wave propagation through wave—mean flow interaction141516. Several studies have suggested links between the EPP indirect effect on ozone and regional wintertime tropospheric climate variability17181920.
    Our results show that the direct, HOx-driven effect of EEP is causing significant, previously unaccounted for, ozone variability in the mesosphere that are observable on solar cycle timescales. Although these effects from EEP-HOx have not been considered in atmospheric and climate models to date, dynamical changes in the mesosphere and stratosphere have been reported as a result of SPEs and the indirect EEP impact on ozone1921.
    Considering the magnitude of the direct ozone effect, tens of percent in wintertime polar regions, it is reasonable to suspect that EEP could be an important contributor to the Sun-climate connection on solar cycle timescales. For comparison, the 11-year variability in UV radiation has a less than 10% effect on annual mean mesospheric ozone at mid-to-low latitude222324. Thus, more research should be directed towards better understanding the potential further effects from EEP and its role in the overall Solar influence on climate. Currently, in most high-top climate models the solar input does not include EEP and it is completely missing from low-top models.

Solar activity impacts polar ozone

Date:
October 14, 2014  Science Daily
Source:
Finnish Meteorological Institute
Summary:
The increase in greenhouse gases explains, to a large extent, the rise in the average temperature of the Earth. According to a new research study, the Sun affects middle atmosphere ozone with potential implications on smaller scale to regional, but not global, climate.[Note: the paper does not say that this effect (which is most prominent in the poles) does not have potential global effects as well]

Scientists have been able to confirm, for the first time, the long-term implications of solar-driven electron impact on the upper middle atmosphere ozone.
Credit: NASA
The increase in greenhouse gases explains, to a large extent, the rise in the average temperature of Earth. According to the research study published in Nature Communications today, the Sun affects middle atmosphere ozone with potential implications on smaller scale to regional, but not global, climate.
Humankind is responsible for the global warming of our climate by increasing the amount of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. However, according results published today, fluctuations in the activity of the Sun impact middle atmosphere ozone, providing a potential link to regional scale climate variability. This climate variability is not a trend, like climate change, but rather year-to-year fluctuations following solar activity. "The detected ozone variation may in part help understand the alternation of local mild and cold winter seasons, as hints have been obtained in previous research that the ozone changes in the middle atmosphere may link as far as the surface of Earth and affect, among other things, polar wind streams," Finnish Meteorological Institute researcher Dr Pekka Verronen reflects.
The research team was able to confirm, for the first time, the long-term implications of solar-driven electron impact on the upper middle atmosphere ozone. The results showed strong effects in the polar latitudes. The amount of ozone at 70-80 km altitude was found to vary more than 30 percent during a solar cycle, a period of approximately 11 years. The ozone variation between the extremes of the Sun's activity is so great that it is likely to impact the temperature balance of the atmosphere. These temperature changes can in turn have an effect on atmospheric winds.
Electrons from space: Auroras and ozone loss
According to the research study conducted by the Finnish Meteorological Institute, University of Otago and the British Antarctic Survey, the electrons, similar to those behind the aurora, cause significant solar cycle variation in the polar mesosphere ozone. The amount of ozone is smaller when more electrons enter the atmosphere. "These results are only the first step but an important one, allowing us to better understand the long-term impacts of this type of solar activity, and its role in regional climate variability," says Dr Monika Andersson who lead the study at Finnish Meteorological Institute.
Earth's radiation belts are regions in near-Earth space that contain vast quantities of solar energetic electrons, trapped there by Earth's magnetic field. During magnetic storms, which are solar wind-driven, the electrons accelerate to high speeds and enter the atmosphere in the polar regions. In the atmosphere, the electrons ionize gas molecules, leading to the production of ozone-depleting catalyst gases. Based on currently available satellite observations, electron precipitation may, during solar storms lasting a few days, reduce ozone in the upper atmosphere (60-80 km) as much as 90 per cent on a momentary basis.

Story Source:
The above story is based on materials provided by Finnish Meteorological Institute.Note: Materials may be edited for content and length.

5 comments:

  1. I claim to be the first to have proposed just such a mechanism:

    "The sun causes latitudinal climate zone shifting with changes in the degree of jetstream zonality / meridionality by altering the ozone creation / destruction balance differentially at different height above the tropopause. The net result is a change in the gradient of tropopause height between equator (relatively high) and poles (relatively low).

    The cause appears not to be raw solar power output (TSI) which varies too little but instead, the precise mix of particles and wavelengths from the sun which varies more greatly and affects ozone amounts above the tropopause.

    That allows latitudinal sliding of the jets and climate zones below the tropopause leading to changes in global cloudiness and albedo which alters the amount of energy getting into the oceans."

    from here:

    http://www.newclimatemodel.com/new-climate-model/


    ReplyDelete
  2. I have been pointing out for some time that the reverse sign effect of solar variation on ozone in the mesosphere (less ozone when the sun is active, more ozone when it is inactive) works down through the polar vortices to affect tropopause heights above the poles relative to the heights above the requator and thereby influence jet stream meridionality, global cloudiness and the proportion of solar energy that is able to enter the oceans to fuel the climate system.

    This paper says that the reduction in ozone occurs most when the sun is active, just as I proposed.

    That reverse sign ozone response is the distinguishing feature of my New Climate Model and they appear to have confirmed it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Stephen,

      Have you created computer code of your model to try hindcasting/projecting?

      Delete
  3. MS.

    No, that is beyond my capability but you can hindcast and project from my simple conceptual model by running through the sequence of real world events and comparing to the sequence set out in my model.

    Applying the sequence works well right back to the Maunder Minimum and accounts for observations during the recent 'pause'.

    Also note the sections about falsification and predictive skill.


    ReplyDelete
  4. It goes back to this:

    "My proposition is that instead the latitudinal shifts are a result of two
    separate
    forces acting together (hence the high mobility of the jets latitudinally)
    when the
    sun is more active with one being a cooling effect at high levels over the
    poles
    pulling the jets poleward and the other being a warming effect at low levels
    over
    the equator pushing the jets poleward at the same time. The cooling effect
    appears to be dominant over longer time periods to give the observed cooling
    of
    the stratosphere and mesosphere when the sun is more active. Nonetheless
    there
    is still overall system warming with the more active sun because of the
    extra
    energy going into the oceans due to the jets shifting poleward thereby
    reducing
    total cloudiness and albedo as shown in the illustration at the head of this
    article."

    from here:

    http://climaterealists.com/attachments/ftp/How%20The%20Sun%20Could%20Control%20Earths%20Temperature.pdf

    25th October 2010

    At that time I was referring to UV and solar protons but in later comments I
    extended that to the general mix of wavelengths and particles which would
    include the charged electrons referred to in this new paper.

    ReplyDelete